Kraven the Hunter Review: Bloody, Pulp Fun With Wasted Potential

A cinematic editorial illustration for a film review of Kraven the Hunter: a rugged, intense hunter in a dark jungle at night, crouched among tangled vines and rain-slick foliage, with subtle urban-industrial prison architecture in the distant background. Moody Sony superhero thriller atmosphere, earthy greens and charcoal shadows, dramatic rim lighting, gritty realistic film-poster composition, no text, no logos, no gore.

I watched this film yesterday, and have quite mixed feelings about it.

Kraven the Hunter is the rare Sony Spider-Man spinoff that almost knows what kind of movie it wants to be, then keeps tripping over the same roots that sank Morbius and Madame Web. J.C. Chandor’s R-rated origin story, released in December 2024, is messy, frequently silly, and visually uneven. It is also bloodier, more committed to its pulp, and occasionally fun.

Aaron Taylor-Johnson plays Sergei Kravinoff, the estranged son of a Russian crime boss who becomes a vigilante hunter of evil men after a lion mauling and a dose of mystical blood give him animal strength, speed, and senses. The film opens with him already operating as an urban legend, then flashes back to a hunting trip in Tanzania with his father Nikolai (Russell Crowe) and softer half-brother Dmitri (Fred Hechinger).

From there it piles on Ariana DeBose’s Calypso, Alessandro Nivola’s Aleksei Sytsevich (the future Rhino), and Christopher Abbott’s Foreigner, before setting up Dmitri as the Chameleon. Screenwriters Richard Wenk, Art Marcum, and Matt Holloway treat the comic-book villain as a brooding antihero with a father complex, which is the right instinct and the wrong dosage.W

hat works is mostly physical. Taylor-Johnson sells the hunter fantasy with real commitment: barefoot climbs, knife work, and a prison sequence that at least has a pulse. The R rating is not decorative. People get mauled, stabbed, and thrown through environments in ways the PG-13 Sony spinoffs never allowed, and for a while that brutality gives the movie a meaner identity than “generic enhanced guy.” Crowe, chewing through a thick accent and a philosophy of dominance, is the most entertaining person on screen whenever he appears; he understands he is in a pulp gangster picture wearing a Marvel badge. Abbott’s Foreigner is similarly slippery and odd, the kind of supporting villain who briefly makes the film feel like it has a personality.

A London chase built around Dmitri’s kidnapping is the clearest evidence that Chandor, better known for Margin Call and All Is Lost, can stage momentum when the effects and geography cooperate.The problems start as soon as the movie has to explain itself. The mythology is a grab bag: lion blood, a family sanctuary, a lawyer who somehow becomes Kraven’s partner in a hit list, and a Rhino subplot that exists mostly so the third act can have a monster.

Accents wander. Calypso is underwritten to the point of comedy; DeBose is stranded with exposition and a personality that never arrives. The special effects, especially anything involving animal movement or Rhino’s transformation, often look unfinished, and critics were right to call out the spatial emptiness of the fights. T

he much-mocked climax, a short mud brawl in a field, is the movie admitting it has run out of ideas. Kraven’s moral position is also fuzzy in a way the script never resolves: he is introduced as the man who only hunts the wicked (but kills men who have done no more than trophy hunt at one point) , then spends the runtime proving he shares more of his father’s appetite than he will admit, without the film committing to either tragedy or satire. That last point is the real missed chance. Classic Kraven stories work because he is a predator with a code who eventually wants the one quarry who can beat him. This film never has Spider-Man, never really needs him for the plot it tells, and still feels shaped by the contractual absence.

The result is an origin that ends by gesturing at a larger universe (Chameleon, a harder Kraven) the box office made irrelevant. Compared with the rest of Sony’s spider-free web, it is less inert than Madame Web and less meme-dead than Morbius, which is faint praise and also true. Put your brain in park and the animal-man set pieces, Crowe’s ham, and the R-rated nastiness can carry an evening. Three stars out of five.

Nuremberg (2025): A Cinematic Exploration of Justice

Not for the faint-hearted, this film is currently being shown on Sky Movies. Nuremberg (2025) is a compelling and meticulously crafted film that succeeds both as a historical drama and as a deeply human exploration of justice, morality, and responsibility. From its opening moments to its final, reflective scenes, the film commands attention with quiet confidence and emotional weight.

One of the film’s greatest strengths is its restrained yet powerful storytelling. Rather than relying on spectacle or melodrama, Nuremberg allows tension to build through dialogue, performance, and ethical confrontation. The screenplay is intelligent and precise, presenting complex legal and moral questions in a way that feels accessible without ever being simplistic. The pacing is deliberate, giving viewers time to absorb the gravity of the events while remaining consistently engaging.

Nuremberg is a 2025 American psychological thriller historical drama film written, co-produced, and directed by James Vanderbilt. Based on the 2013 book The Nazi and the Psychiatrist by Jack El-Hai, the film follows U.S. Army psychiatrist Douglas Kelley (Rami Malek) seeking to carry out an assignment to investigate the personalities and monitor the mental status of Hermann Göring (Russell Crowe) and other high-ranking Nazis in preparation for and during the Nuremberg trials. Leo Woodall, John Slattery, Mark O’Brien, Colin Hanks, Wrenn Schmidt, Lydia Peckham, Richard E. Grant, and Michael Shannon have supporting roles in the film.

Russell Crowe, in particular, gives a breathtaking performance as Hermann Göring. The back and forth of his testimony is the central plank of the film.

Visually, Nuremberg (2025) is striking in its understatement. The cinematography favors muted tones and carefully composed frames, reinforcing the somber atmosphere without feeling oppressive. Production design is detailed and immersive, effectively transporting the audience to the post-war setting while maintaining a grounded, realistic feel. The score is used sparingly but effectively, enhancing emotional moments without overwhelming them.

What truly elevates the film is its thematic depth. Nuremberg does not simply recount historical events—it invites reflection on accountability, the rule of law, and the enduring consequences of moral choices. The film resonates strongly in a modern context, reminding viewers why truth, justice, and ethical responsibility remain essential values. Its relevance feels intentional and timely, adding an extra layer of significance to the viewing experience.

In the end, Nuremberg (2025) stands out as a thoughtful, mature, and deeply respectful film. It is not only an important historical portrayal but also a gripping cinematic experience that lingers long after the credits roll. Powerful without being preachy and emotional without being manipulative, it is a film that rewards careful attention and thoughtful reflection. Highly recommended for audiences seeking intelligent, meaningful cinema.

The film gets five stars out of five from me. Beware, there are some horrific images from the concentration camps in the film.

Have you seen it? Let me know in the comments.