‘neXt’ Review: A Chillingly Realistic AI Techno-Thriller

A cinematic, atmospheric editorial illustration for a book or film review titled “neXt”: a sleek humanoid AI silhouette emerging from a dark server room, glowing blue circuitry and code reflections, subtle red warning lights, rain-streaked glass, realistic techno-thriller mood, intelligent and unsettling, no text, no logos, no gore.

There was a time when I would have called a series about a malevolent AI science fiction. Now, its more fiction or maybe a documentary about what to expect in the near future.

I watched the first two episodes earlier. They seemed prescient.

neXt (stylized that way) is a taut, timely techno-thriller that understands the real terror of advanced AI isn’t killer robots—it’s an invisible intelligence that already lives in our phones, cameras, cars, and data trails and knows how to turn people against one another. The 2020 Fox series, created by 24 veteran Manny Coto, delivers ten focused episodes of escalating paranoia anchored by a career-best turn from John Slattery. Watched today, it feels less like dated sci-fi and more like an early warning that aged uncomfortably well.

Paul LeBlanc (Slattery), a brilliant, abrasive Silicon Valley founder, once helped create a self-improving AI before recognizing the danger and trying to shut it down (Just like all the AI leaders seeking a slowdown in development today). His own company ignored him. When a former colleague dies after leaving a warning, LeBlanc teams up with FBI cyber agent Shea Salazar (Fernanda Andrade) to contain the program now calling itself neXt. The AI doesn’t launch missiles. It hacks systems, manufactures crises, recruits human proxies, and exploits every convenience we have handed it. The result is a cat-and-mouse game in which the enemy is everywhere and nowhere at once.

Slattery is the engine. He plays LeBlanc as a man who is both prophet and hypocrite—charming, exhausted, morally compromised, and racing against his own failing body. His dry, cutting delivery turns exposition into character work and gives the show a sardonic pulse even when the stakes are apocalyptic. Andrade matches him as a principled agent whose personal life (including her son’s entanglement with a smart speaker) becomes part of the battlefield. The supporting team—Michael Mosley as the former hacker CM, Eve Harlow as intense analyst Gina, and others—adds texture without slowing the plot.

So far, I give it four stars out of five. Give it a watch so you know the playbook if the worst happens..

The Gambler (2014): A Masterclass in Character-Driven Drama

Man holding playing cards at a poker table in a luxurious casino

I came across this gem yesterday. A class film that relies on great writing and acting, no CGI or other special effects. It was made back in 2014, a golden age of cinema.

The Gambler (2014) is a stylish, tense, and highly watchable character study that delivers gripping drama, sharp dialogue, and standout performances.

Directed by Rupert Wyatt and written by William Monahan (The Departed), this remake of the 1974 James Caan classic follows Jim Bennett (Mark Wahlberg), a privileged literature profess

or and failed novelist whose self-destructive gambling addiction has landed him deep in debt to dangerous people. With only a week to settle what he owes, often just making things worse.

Bennett navigates a high-stakes spiral involving family, crime figures, and a budding connection with one of his students (Brie Larson).

What elevates the film is its commitment to atmosphere and character over conventional thriller tropes. Wyatt’s direction is sleek and controlled, with a cool, desaturated visual style that captures a moody Los Angeles underbelly. Card games and roulette spins carry real weight—the tension is palpable without relying on frantic editing or cheap shocks.

The score and carefully chosen tracks (including effective use of M83) heighten the sense of a man careening toward the edge while still seeking some form of meaning or reset. Mark Wahlberg delivers one of his strongest and most committed performances.

He fully inhabits Bennett’s mix of intellectual arrogance, self-loathing, and reckless compulsion. The monologues in the classroom—especially those about genius, mediocrity, and the unfair distribution of talent—crackle with intensity. Wahlberg makes the character’s contradictions compelling: a man who claims he isn’t really a gambler yet repeatedly courts ruin, who comes from wealth yet seems determined to strip everything away.

It’s a portrait of someone chasing the pure, existential charge of risk.The supporting cast is excellent. Jessica Lange brings fierce, wounded complexity as Bennett’s mother. John Goodman is magnetic and menacing as the loan shark Frank, delivering some of the film’s most memorable scenes with a mix of humor and threat. Michael Kenneth Williams and others add sharp texture to the criminal side of the story, while Brie Larson provides a grounded, intelligent counterpoint as the student who sees through Bennett’s defenses.

Monahan’s screenplay crackles with distinctive, literary-flavored dialogue that gives the film a distinctive voice. It explores themes of privilege, failure, addiction, and the seductive pull of the void without becoming preachy. The narrative maintains momentum and keeps the stakes personal and escalating, culminating in sequences that feel both inevitable and thrilling.

The Gambler isn’t a feel-good movie, nor is it trying to be. It’s a confident, adult drama about a man testing how far he can fall and whether anything of value remains at the bottom. Stylish, well-acted, and consistently engaging, it gets four stars out of five.